Mr. Prabhakar D. Karandikar, I.A.S. 1973 (Maharashtra RR). Voluntary Retirement: 2007,
M.A. (Politics) from Pune University, M.Sc. (Economics) from London School of Economics,
Worked as Corporate Adviser Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. 2007 -2010
ABSTRACT:
Registry of a Court is a powerful body which performs a critical administrative function. It works under the supervision of the Chief Judge, who forms that benches and allocates subjects to each of the Judge / Bench. Thereafter the Registry, acting under a set of rules, is responsible for listing cases (known as ‘cause-list’) for hearing before each judge or bench of judges. Several controversies have arisen about (a) formation of benches and (b) listing of cases. On numerous occasions the litigant public, the advocates and at times, judges too, have expressed dissatisfaction with listing of cases and granting urgency to certain cases. Charges of obfuscation, non-transparency, non-accountability, favouritism or plain corruption have been leveled against the Registry. Despite several representations, Public Interest Litigations or applications under the Right to Information Act, the working of Registries has still remained shrouded in mystery and secrecy. Information Technology is increasing being used by the Registries but still complaints are being raised. Formulation of transparent rules, closer supervision and installation of a grievance-redressal system are some of the urgent reforms that can bring about greater efficiency of the Registries, which will also help in reducing judicial pendency.
Comments