top of page

Voices Vs. The State: The Evolution And Impact Of Sedition Law In India




Ekveer Singh, IILM University Gurugram


ABSTRACT


Sedition laws in India have long been a subject of debate, given their colonial origins and impact on free speech. Initially introduced by the British to suppress dissent, these laws have continued to be used post-independence to silence criticism of the government. While courts have attempted to narrow their scope, instances of misuse persist, sparking concerns about their relevance in a modern democracy. Many legal experts, scholars, and public figures have criticized sedition laws for being outdated and undemocratic. The right to criticize the government is fundamental to democracy, and retaining sedition laws contradicts this principle. Therefore, repealing sedition laws is essential to uphold the spirit of free speech and democratic values in India.


Keywords: Sedition laws, free speech, democracy, colonial legacy, Indian Penal Code (IPC), Section 124A, government criticism, legal challenges, constitutional rights, public dissent, judicial interpretation, misuse of sedition, fundamental rights, freedom of expression, democratic values.



Recent Posts

See All

Comentários


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page