Niharika Jha, Law College Dehradun, Uttaranchal University
INTRODUCTION
The phrase "Artificial Intelligence," or AI, describes tech that can carry out activities that necessitate a person's intellect. It seems intriguing that eventually the collected, omniscient reasoning of an impartial computerized administrator will settle our chaotic, irrational human conflicts. Although the idea may be intriguing, it is a big step from human-powered judgment to computer law. This idea alludes to the fact that in a few decades, computerized justice will replace human-powered fairness.
A lot appear having come to the conclusion that this probable situation is unavoidable, even though we still don't possess a fully evolved system that might triumph over, similar to the idea of robotic vacuums or autonomous vehicles. Right now, all we can do is wait for the adjustments to materialize. The introduction of the computerized judgment is inevitable for a number of causes. Every year, conflicts between people amount to billions—and eventually, dozens of billions—of dollars. There are no indications of a break in this conflict intensification. The structure is being burdened by people's desire for immediate solutions to issues. There are significant concerns raised by the notion that the current system of human- based mediation could settle all of these cases.
The utilization of electronic equipment in the judicial industry continues to be gradually increasing, and it has undergone constant change. Since it can suggest the best conflict settlement method based on the type of disagreement, the available proof, and the relationship among both sides, DRExM [1] was recently implemented in Egypt to settle disputes regarding construction.
Comments