top of page
Ujwal Trivedi

Vegalta Sendai V/S PFC CSKA Moscow – A Case Of ‘Ad Imposibilia Nemo Tenetur’?




Ujwal Trivedi, Partner at M/s Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co (Advocates, Solicitors & Notary), MKA Chambers, British Hotel Lane, Off Mumbai Samachar Marg, Fort, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

ABSTRACT

The present article deals with a pertinent issue of interpreting commercial legal contracts between two football clubs for loaning a player. The loan arrangement was conditional in nature as it mandated that the player plays 50% of the games in a season. Unfortunately, the player gets injured during the season and the club concerned is unable to provide the player with sufficient game time. CAS in the present case had the opportunity of weighing ‘the literal interpretation’ approach against ‘a purposive interpretation’ approach in interpreting commercial contracts. Should CAS literally abide by the 50% stipulated target of achieving game time or should it take into account the player injury which made it impossible to provide game time to the player concerned? This article analysis the case with an Indian perspective on the findings of CAS jurisprudence before revealing the outcome of the present case.

Comments


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page