top of page

Unconstitutionality Of The Hijab Ban




Zoya Hassan, Jindal Global Law School Sai Leshanth Pulikesi, Jindal Global Law School

ABSTRACT

The ban on the hijab in educational institutions in Karnataka violates Article 14 and Article 25. The concept of substantial equality and indirect discrimination has been a focal point in judicial debates and judgements. Although the ban was for all religious attire and seemed neutral, in applying the test of indirect discrimination, we find that the effect of this ban fell disproportionately on Muslim female students. Instead of accommodating them by prescribing a uniform colour of hijab, the absolute ban led to the educational deprivation of these students, who are already historically disadvantaged in terms of access to education. Moreover, the ban instilled fear and feeling of ostracization. India has consistently reaffirmed its diligence and dedication to pluralism and tolerance. In consonance, the hijab must be respected and accommodated, as many Muslim women consider it a part of their religious beliefs. This paper does scrutinise the application of the ERP test, in rejecting the theological approach of the Court in deciding whether a belief is ‘fundamental’, amidst a diverse and varied population with differing beliefs. Thus, the ban must be declared unconstitutional, being ultra vires Article 14 and 25.

Keywords: Hijab; Constitution; Equality; Religion

Comments


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page