top of page

The Impact Of No-Poaching Agreements On Job Mobility




Gourav Kumar Sharma, GST Practioner, Infinity Services (Co-Founder), An Accounts Outsourcing Firm, Indore (M.P)


ABSTRACT


No-poaching agreements, commonly used by businesses to prevent the recruitment of each other's employees, have attracted significant attention in recent years due to their potential impact on job mobility and labor market dynamics. This abstract provides a concise overview of the key findings and implications related to the impact of no-poaching agreements on job mobility. No-poaching agreements can hinder job mobility by limiting employees' ability to explore career opportunities with competing firms. These agreements often result in reduced competition for talent and can lead to lower wage growth and fewer job choices for workers. Research indicates that such agreements can decrease wage growth for affected employees, as they are denied the benefits of competitive job offers that may lead to higher compensation. Furthermore, these agreements have been scrutinized for their potential to stifle innovation and productivity. By limiting the movement of talent between companies, employees may miss out on opportunities for skill development and exposure to different work environments, which can have long-term effects on their career growth and the overall competitiveness of industries.


Keywords: No-poaching agreements, Job mobility, Talent retention

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page