top of page

The Group Of Companies Doctrine: A New Pillar In Indian Arbitration Law

 



Huda Allil, Research Scholar, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi


ABSTRACT


The Group of Companies Doctrine (GCD) has become a crucial idea in Indian arbitration law, fundamentally altering the conventional interpretation of corporate consent and the extent of non-signatory involvement in arbitration agreements. Grounded in the idea of party autonomy, arbitration conventionally requires explicit consent from all participating parties. The growing intricacy of commercial transactions, particularly within multinational corporate frameworks, has led Indian courts to acknowledge and implement the GCD to obligate non-signatory affiliates that demonstrate behaviour suggesting an intention to adhere to arbitration agreements.


This study rigorously analyzes the development of GCD jurisprudence in India, emphasizing significant verdicts such as Chloro Controls India Pvt. Ltd. v. Severn Trent Water Purification and MTNL v. Canara Bank.These rulings have been significant in legitimizing the theory, allowing courts to enforce arbitration agreements against non-signatories when their participation in the negotiation, execution, or performance of the contract is apparent. The GCD assists in preventing corporations from circumventing arbitral duties via strategic legal structuring; yet, its implementation has ignited discussions about judicial activism, vagueness in legal standards, and possible violations of consent-based arbitration principles.


Despite its increasing acceptance, the inconsistency in judicial application and the expansive interpretation of implied consent present obstacles, especially in cross-border disputes where predictability and uniformity are essential. This study advocates for a more systematic and principled implementation of the GCD, proposing a framework that aligns with India's pro-arbitration policy while preserving essential arbitration principles such as voluntary consent and contractual integrity. In this manner, Indian arbitration law can achieve equilibrium between commercial pragmatism and doctrinal integrity, so augmenting its legitimacy and efficacy in the global arbitration arena.


Keywords: The Group of Companies, Binding Non-signatories, Arbitration Agreement Extension, Corporate Arbitration, Implied Consent, Party Autonomy and Consent in Arbitration.




Recent Posts

See All

Comentários


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page