top of page

The Evolution And Impact Of India's Arbitration And Conciliation Act: A Comprehensive Analysis

The Evolution And Impact Of India's Arbitration And Conciliation Act: A Comprehensive Analysis Of The 2020 Amendments




Advocate Kajal Tyagi


ABSTRACT


This comprehensive article explores the evolution and impact of India's Arbitration and Conciliation Act, with a particular focus on the 2020 amendments. The introduction sets the stage by highlighting the Act's origins in aligning Indian arbitration law with the UNCITRAL Model Law and its growing relevance in the global context. The historical context explains the need for a unified legislation on arbitration in the wake of India's economic liberalization. It also emphasizes the influence of the UNCITRAL Model Law on the 1996 Act. The article then delves into the structure of the 1996 Act, dissecting its four distinct parts, highlighting its role in streamlining arbitration in India.


The core of the article examines the 2020 amendments, emphasizing two crucial changes in sections 36 and 43-J. The unconditional stay on enforcement under section 36 aims to expedite the process and prevent potential misuse, balancing the interests of parties. The removal of the eighth schedule and substitution with regulations for arbitrator accreditation provides flexibility and inclusivity, opening the door to a broader pool of arbitrators. The article evaluates the implications of these amendments, noting potential challenges and the need for judicious application and comprehensive regulations.


Furthermore, the article underscores the increasing significance of India in global arbitration, given its growing role in international trade and commerce. It discusses India's role as a mediator and arbitrator in international disputes and highlights the importance of maintaining a credible and impartial arbitration framework.


The impact of foreign involvement in Indian arbitration is explored, noting the benefits of transparency and impartiality that foreign arbitrators can bring, while also acknowledging challenges arising from cultural differences and legal expertise. The 2020 amendments' impact on international arbitration is examined, emphasizing how the unconditional stay provision and changes in arbitrator accreditation may influence the international arbitration landscape.


The article also addresses challenges in the enforcement of foreign awards, including conditions for enforcement, jurisdictional issues, and delays. It emphasizes the need for streamlining the enforcement process to ensure timely resolutions.


In conclusion, the article underscores the evolving nature of India's arbitration framework in response to the demands of an increasingly globalized world. It highlights the importance of clear and comprehensive regulations, judicious application of the 2020 amendments, and streamlined enforcement. The way forward is outlined, emphasizing India's growing role as a global economic power and the potential for enhancing its reputation as a hub for international arbitration, benefiting both domestic and foreign parties involved in disputes.


Keywords: Arbitration Act, 2020 amendments, international arbitration, unconditional stay, accreditation of arbitrators, Indian arbitration framework, enforcement of foreign awards, global trade, mediation, economic significance.

Recent Posts

See All

Commentaires


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page