top of page

Roe-Casey-Dobbs: Tracing The (D)Evolution Of The Constitutional Right To Abortion In America




Sujith Nair, LL.B., Kishinchand Chellaram Law College, Mumbai

ABSTRACT

The right to abortion has always been one of the most controversial legal issues in any jurisdiction. It is a question that invites commentary from a very wide range of disciplines, ranging from philosophy and religion to political thought and public policy. What has been more factious is the debate about whether a court has any authority to weigh in on this issue in the absence of an explicit constitutional or statutory provision regarding the same. This is exactly what happened in 1973, when the Supreme Court of the United States declared abortion a federal right guaranteed under the Constitution. The ensuing question, and the central legal issue for our consideration, is not whether abortion should be permitted or prohibited, or what factors should be considered while balancing the interests of the woman, the baby, and the State, but rather how a constitutional text is interpreted and the role of the judiciary in such partisan matters. In this note, I have tried to trace the reasoning of the U.S. Supreme Court in its 3 landmark cases on abortion, which has finally culminated in the desolation of any federally guaranteed right to abortion and has given the authority to regulate abortion to the individual states.

Comments


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page