top of page

Revisiting The Nexus Of Law And Morality




Arjun Bahl, OP Jindal Global University

INTRODUCTION:

Jeremy Bentham once said, “the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation.” Thomas Hobbes was one of the first jurists to have considered the inclusion of a moral purpose while defining the law. While Hobbes advocated the notion of absolute power, he was against the idea of an arbitrary exercise of this power. Unlike future jurists, the idea of demonstrating law as a scientific fact did not appeal to Hobbes, and according to him, it was the moral duty of the subjects to obey the law being made. Hobbes believed that “the greater good demanded that people equate the law to the command of the sovereign.”

The concept of law and morality has been deliberated upon by several jurists, primarily Jeremy Bentham and John Austin, and the work of these jurists was instrumental to the development of the school of legal positivism. Several judges in various countries across the world have based their decisions on the school of legal positivism.

Comments


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page