Garrv Jain & Pranava Kapur, Jindal Global Law University
ABSTRACT
The 2016 Bollywood film "Rustom," starring Akshay Kumar, is based on the real-life K.M. Nanavati v State of Bombay case, which was a landmark case in Indian legal history. The film portrays Commander Rustom Pavri, a naval officer who is betrayed by his wife's extramarital affair with a wealthy businessman, Vikram Makhija. Makhija's corrupt business practices involving the Indian Navy eventually lead to Pavri's revenge killing of Makhija. The film depicts the subsequent legal proceedings and the controversy surrounding the jury system, which was prevalent at the time. The film highlights the bias and influence of the media and public opinion on the jury and their verdict. The case also portrays Pavri's decision to represent himself in court, showcasing the application of the Layman term intensity. The filmmakers emphasize the social and legal implications of media trials and the potential influence they can have on the judicial process. The film's portrayal of the Nanavati case brings attention to the complex legal and social issues that were prevalent in India at the time. The film serves as a reminder of the importance of impartiality in the legal system and the potential dangers of media influence. The movie's focus on these themes and its relevance to contemporary legal issues make it a significant contribution to Indian cinema.
Keywords: Rustom, K.M. Nanavati case, Indian legal history, jury system, media trial, social bias.
Comments