Review Of Judicial Discourse On Legal Education In India

Arun Laxman Patil, LLM, Bharati Vidyapeeth’s Yashwantrao Chavan Law College, Malkapur. Karad, Dist. Satara Maharashtra

I. ABSTRACT

This thesis examines the discourse on legal education in India as reflected in judicial pronouncements from the Supreme Court and/or High Courts. It analyses how the judiciary has addressed concerns regarding the current system's focus on theoretical knowledge and the perceived lack of practical skills development. The research explores major themes emerging from these pronouncements, including the need for enhanced practical skills training, integration of clinical legal education, and addressing accessibility and inclusivity challenges.

Through critical analysis, the thesis explores the strengths and limitations of the judicial perspective on legal education reforms. It examines how effectively judicial pronouncements translate to tangible changes and considers potential limitations in this approach. Additionally, the research acknowledges dissenting opinions or alternative perspectives on the issue.

Drawing upon the findings, the thesis proposes concrete recommendations for improving legal education in India. These recommendations might encompass curriculum redesign with a focus on practical skills, embracing technology and online learning resources, promoting clinical legal education and internships, and addressing accessibility and inclusivity concerns.

Ultimately, the thesis delves into the ongoing debate on legal education reform in India and suggests potential impacts of implementing the proposed recommendations. By examining the judicial discourse and proposing solutions, this research aims to contribute to ongoing discussions and efforts towards enhancing and modernizing legal education in India.