Viraj Pratap Khatter, IILM University
INTRODUCTION
Although for a fair trial a person needs conclusive evidence to prove that either the offences has been committed or not, many a time facts speaks itself that it is an offence, or wrong act has been done. There is a normal presumption that, a person files a case against defendant and the burden of prove is totally up to the plaintiff that the defendant had committed any wrongful act, then onus will shit to defendant but if the plaintiff fails to prove to act of an defendant then the judgement has been passed in favour of the defendant. Thus there are lots of cases in which a plaintiff need not to prove anything, the facts of the case is sufficient to prove it as an offence1.
Kommentare