Rituraj Mal Deka, BA.LLB, School of Law, Christ (Deemed to be University)
ABSTRACT
This paper conducts a critical analysis of the legal framework controlling online content regulation and censorship with a particular emphasis on the difficulties and problems associated with the preservation of free speech online. In addition to significant international and regional laws and standards on the subject, the paper looks at the philosophical and theoretical foundations of online speech and freedom of expression. Additionally, it examines the legal systems in a few different nations or areas, comparing various legal theories and models and rating their efficiency, legitimacy, and accountability. The technique for data gathering and analysis in this study combines legal and policy analysis with case studies, comparative research, and academic publications. Primary materials consulted include legal texts, law, reports from international and national organizations, and academic articles. .This paper focuses on the excessive regulations of the government on online content and suppressing voices of the minorities. The research’s findings indicate that, despite regional and national differences in the legislative frameworks governing online content management and censorship, there are similar issues and debates surrounding the preservation of free speech online. In order to effectively preserve freedom of expression online and address valid concerns about hate speech, false information, and online harassment, the paper makes proposals for enhancing the legal frameworks controlling online content management and censorship.
Comments