Kumar Kartikey Mishra, Fairfield Institute of Management & Technology (GGSIP University, New Delhi)
ABSTRACT
This research undertakes a comprehensive analysis of the "One Nation, One Election" initiative, critically examining its merits, challenges, and viability within the Indian context. By employing a doctrinal methodology, the study delves into the historical background of Indian elections, the legal and constitutional frameworks governing electoral processes, and the intricacies of the proposed simultaneous election model.
Introduction
In the vibrant tapestry of India's democracy, the notion of synchronizing elections across all levels of governance has emerged as a topic of intense debate and scrutiny. Termed as "One Nation, One Election", this concept proposes to streamline the electoral process by conducting elections for the Lok Sabha (the lower house of India's Parliament) and the State Legislative Assemblies simultaneously. The idea aims to foster efficiency, reduce electoral expenditure, and minimize the disruptions caused by frequent polls. However, the proposal is not devoid of complexities and challenges, intertwining legal, constitutional, logistical, and political intricacies.
Statement of Problem
The concept of "One Nation, One Election" proposes holding simultaneous elections for all levels of government—Parliament, state legislatures, and local bodies—on the same day, instead of staggering them over several years. This approach seeks to address multiple issues associated with the current electoral process in India, including substantial financial expenditures, the prolonged deployment of security forces, governance paralysis during election periods due to the enforcement of the Model Code of Conduct, and frequent policy disruptions caused by the electoral cycle.
コメント