Harsh Jain, Indore Institute of Law, Indore (M.P.)
ABSTRACT
This Article examines the moral and legal implications of euthanasia and the right to die in India, emphasising significant court rulings that have influenced the nation’s philosophy of end-of-life care. Euthanasia, also known as “mercy killing,” is a complicated junction of legal medical, and human rights considerations. From early discussions about suicide to the Supreme Court’s recognition of passive euthanasia in Aruna Shanbaug v. Union of India (2011) and the recognition of the Right to Die under Article 211 of the Indian Constitution. Passive euthanasia is now lawful under certain conditions, but active euthanasia is still prohibited.
The article discusses the notion of dying with dignity, the legal situation of euthanasia in India at the moment, and the continuous ethical worries about autonomy, the sanctity of life, and the possibility of misuse. Through this analysis, the article draws attention to the tenuous balance that exists in Indian law between protecting life and upholding a person’s right to die with dignity. The article also explores moral conundrums related to euthanasia, including medical ethics and patient vulnerability. The article provides insights into the continuing discussion around euthanasia and its possible place in India’s legal and ethical environment by examining significant case laws and the country’s present legal situation.
Keywords: Euthanasia, Mercy-killing, Article 21, Conundrums.
Commentaires