Judicial Intervention On Discrimination Based On Religious And Traditional Practices
- IJLLR Journal
- Nov 24, 2023
- 1 min read
Sneha Raj, LL.M. (Human Rights Specialisation), New Law College, Bharati Vidyapeeth, Pune
ABSTRACT
Discrimination based on religious and traditional practices remains a persistent societal issue that requires appropriate measures to ensure equality and justice for all individuals. This abstract provides an overview of judicial intervention in addressing discrimination stemming from religious and traditional practices. It explores the role of courts in upholding constitutional values, safeguarding fundamental rights, and promoting social cohesion.
The abstract begins by highlighting the prevalence of discrimination based on religious and traditional practices in various societies and the harmful consequences it imposes on affected individuals. It emphasizes the significance of judicial intervention as an essential mechanism for rectifying such discrimination and promoting a more inclusive society.
The subsequent sections delve into the legal framework governing religious and traditional practices, focusing on constitutional provisions, international human rights standards, and domestic legislation that prohibit discrimination. This discussion establishes the legal basis for judicial intervention in cases related to religious and traditional discrimination.
Then examines notable court cases from different jurisdictions that have addressed discrimination based on religious and traditional practices. It explores the diverse range of issues that have come before the courts, including restrictions on religious attire, unequal treatment based on religious beliefs, and discriminatory practices rooted in traditional customs. Through these cases, the abstract elucidates how courts have interpreted and applied the law to rectify instances of discrimination and set precedents for future cases.
Keywords: Judicial intervention, Discrimination, Religious practices, Traditional practices, Constitutional rights, Human rights, Court cases, Cultural sensitivity, social cohesion.
Comments