Bharath Gaikwad R, School of Law, SASTRA (Deemed to be) University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India
ABSTRACT
The advent of AI has drastically impacted the functioning of the world in various aspects. It has simplified many tasks and has generated astonishing and commendable outputs that human beings were not able to accomplish. But, it has a negative impact on the Constitutional and Human Rights of the people. As a result, a system of checks and balances must be in place to limit AI's effect, particularly with regard to how it may affect job prospects. This research article's first section addresses how AI affects human rights and the constitution, with a focus on how it affects employment prospects and how it affects the world's major economies in comparison. The impact of such intersection of AI on employment opportunities is further substantiated by an empirical analysis conducted. The findings of the analysis are also shown in this Article. Also, effects on privacy due to AI have also been highlighted, specifically the mechanism of continuous authentication. The second part of this Article is about Design Thinking. Design Thinking is a process that aims to modify the whole thinking mechanism and it channelizes to refresh the thinking mechanism. The main aim of design thinking is to challenge the existing assumptions and give innovative solutions as output. It paves way for an entirely different way to think. In the field of Law, design thinking has been rarely applied and there exists a huge vacuum in this area of research. But, if we go into the roots of the Law – making process, we would realise the necessity of design thinking in the legal field. Moreover, it is in the areas of Law, where design thinking is really required. Regulations on AI’s impact on human life are formulated keeping in mind the interests of various stakeholders involved. This process involves lengthy brainstorming sessions, analysing benefits and burden of the proposed Laws on these stakeholders upon whom the Laws are to be implemented, gathering feedback, tabling them in the legislature, debating upon them and then passing them. This Article concludes with reference to India’s AI Mission and by stating that design thinking is a prospective solution to determine the point where AI’s activities have to be stopped so that it does not intersect with Constitutional and Human Rights of the people and also in their employment opportunities.
Comments