top of page

Euthanasia And Indian Constitution: A Comparative Legal Analysis




Juhi Singh, LL.M, Amity Law School, Amity University

Dr. Axita Shrivastava, Assistant Professor, Amity Law School, Amity University


ABSTRACT


This research paper explores the legal, constitutional, and ethical dimensions of euthanasia in India, examining how the Indian judiciary has interpreted the right to die within the framework of Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. The paper analyzes landmark Supreme Court decisions, such as Common Cause v. Union of India (2018), which recognized passive euthanasia under specific conditions. It also provides a comparative legal analysis with jurisdictions like the Netherlands, Belgium, Canada, and the United States, where euthanasia or assisted dying is permitted under regulated frameworks. By highlighting both international perspectives and India’s unique socio-cultural and legal context, the study discusses the challenges and implications of recognizing euthanasia as a constitutionally protected right. The paper concludes with the argument that any move toward legalization in India must be accompanied by strong safeguards to prevent misuse, ensure ethical medical practices, and protect the dignity and autonomy of individuals.


Keywords: Euthanasia, Indian Constitution, Right to Die, Comparative Law, Legal Framework, Medical Ethics, Human Rights



Recent Posts

See All

Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page