top of page

Empowering The Gig Worker- Comparative Insights And Pathways For Reform.


Godala Alexandria Minakshi Devi, LLB, University of Leeds, UK


ABSTRACT


This research examines the legal status of gig workers in India, a rapidly growing workforce segment. Despite the significant contribution of the gig economy, existing labour laws fail to address the unique challenges and vulnerabilities these workers face. While the Social Security Code 2020 offers some benefits, its implementation remains weak. Although some states have introduced legislation to benefit gig workers, there needs to be an effort all over India, and implementation needs to be effective. Drawing parallels with the UK, where the landmark Uber BV v Aslam case emphasised the reality of work over contractual terms, this research advocates a shift in focus in India. Key recommendations for reform include clear legal definitions, minimum wage guarantees, collective bargaining rights, and more vigorous enforcement mechanisms. By implementing these reforms, India can ensure that the benefits of the gig economy are shared equitably and that gig workers have the necessary protections to thrive in this dynamic and increasingly important sector.



Comments


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page