top of page

Early Dismissal In Investment Arbitration: Analysing Ansung V. China And Issues With ICSID Rule 41(5)




Milinda Sharma, Queen Mary University of London


PART I


ANSUNG HOUSING CO. LTD. v.

PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA

(ICSID CASE NO-ARB/14/25)


EARLY DISMISSAL FOR MANIFEST LACK OF LEGAL MERIT


In its Award dated 09 March 2017, the ICSID Tribunal dismissed the claims of the Claimant (Ansung Housing Co. Ltd.) pursuant to the invocation of ICSID Arbitration Rule 41(5) by the Respondent (Peoples Republic of China) in ICSID Case No-ARB/14/25.


Basis:


- The Agreement between the Government of Republic of Korea and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on the Protection and Promotion of Investments, 01 December 2007 (“China-Korea BIT”)


- Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States, 14 October 1966 (“ICSID Convention”)


Main Issues:


- Legal Standard for ICSID Arbitration Rule 41(5) and (6)


- Applicability of MFN Treatment to the limitation provision in a BIT

Comentarios


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page