Ananya Jain, Lloyd Law College
ABSTRACT
This research paper aims to dissect the different aspects of sealed cover jurisprudence within the Indian judicial system. Sealed cover jurisprudence involves donating sensitive or non-public information to the court in a sealed envelope, accessible only to the presiding judge. Despite the absence of a specific legal frame for sealed cover jurisprudence, the Supreme Court derives its authority to employ it from Rule 7 of Order XIII of the Supreme Court Rules 2013 and Section 123 of the IEA, 1872. The objectification of particular or non-public data in sealed covers raises enterprises about implicit contraventions on individualities' sequestration or breaches of trust. Applying sealed cover justice may also impact the right to a fair trial, as parties may be deprived of access to pivotal substantiation or arguments considered in the decision-making process. Accordingly, this exploration lawyers for the addition of parties within the dimension of sealed cover justice and the establishment of specific laws guiding its use. These laws would give the court clear directives on employing sealed cover justice in select cases to ensure a fair trial and uphold the principles of natural justice. In conclusion, the exploration emphasizes the need for nonsupervisory measures governing sealed cover justice, prompting a careful balance between its use and the foundational principles of due process, fair trial, and open justice.
Comments