top of page

Critical Analysis Of Objections To Uniform Civil Code




Harshita Jain, Assistant Professor, IILM University, Gurugram

ABSTRACT

Uniform Civil Code, is enshrined under Article 44 of the Directive Principles of State Policy, of the Constitution of India. It is defined as “One nation, One Law”. It mainly aims to replace Personal Laws based on the scriptures and customs of each major religious community in India with a common set of rules governing every citizen. It symbolizes that every citizen of India should pay respect to one codified law, irrespective of their religion. Many objections to enactment of the Uniform Civil Code, have been raised by various communities of the country, including, objections like, Secularism, difficulty in devising law, neglecting of the minority communities, diversity and cultural Identity. This paper seeks to critically analyze these objections. The Uniform civil code would codify the practices of each religion, including the customary practices, which are not derogatory or discriminatory to the society. Thus, Article 44, should be enacted, but only after due awareness and proper caution.

Keywords: Personal Laws, Customs, Codification, Uniform


Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page