top of page

Comparative Analysis Of The Trial Procedure In Civil And Common Law Countries




Ananya Singh, Jindal Global Law School

ABSTRACT

This paper compares the trial procedure in a civil law and common law country. The procedure followed in common law countries is adversarial in nature and the one in civil law countries is inquisitorial. Here, we differentiate and explain the two. Along with looking at the merits and demits of both. It further also expands upon the entire steps of the trial procedure followed in India i.e., common law country and France i.e., civil law country.

Introduction

The criminal justice system is a web of government and private organizations entrusted with catching criminals and prosecuting them, then conducting investigation to find proof; followed by filing charges, formation of defense, trial proceeding, and declaration of sentence i.e. if guilty or innocent. The main objective of this system is to dispense justice by providing the required machinery for detecting crime, apprehending criminals, seizing weapons, and gathering evidence, determining guilt or innocence of suspects, and punishing the guilty.

There are many different types of criminal justice systems around the world that construct a social standard policy, the law, to preserve and maintain order and peace within their jurisdiction. Broadly, every legal system in the world can be divided into two categories: Adversarial and Inquisitorial systems.

Comments


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page