top of page

Case Note: Associate Builders v. Delhi Development Authority





Utsav Srivastava, OP Jindal Global University


Appellants: Associate Builders

Vs.

Respondent: Delhi Development Authority


Hon'ble Judges/Coram: EC: (2015) 3 SCC 49


Ranjan Gogoi and Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ


FACTS


The appellant herein question is a contractor who was awarded a work contract by the DDA for construction of buildings but because of some circumstances the builders even after having all of their machinery ready at the site were not able to complete their work in time and finally there was a delay of 25 months from the stipulated date of completion. This delay was completely attributed to DDA by the arbitrators in the case who decided the claims of the contractor. The arbitral award granted by the arbitrators to the contractor was Rs. 23.39 lakhs. This matter was taken up to the learned single judge of the High Court and was dismissed, later an appeal was filed by the DDA impugning the order of Learned Single judge (under s. 371). The division bench set aside the impugned order and scaled down the claims referring it to as ‘rough and ready justice’. Now the appeal is before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.

Comments


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page