top of page

Case Commentary On Sushil Kumari Dang Vs Prem Kumar Dang, AIR 1976 Delhi 321, 11 February, 1976




Karthik Alahari, BBA LLB (Hons), School of Law, Alliance University, Bangalore

Citation: AIR 1976 Delhi 321

Bench: Hon’ble Justice A.B. Rohatgi

Introduction The remedy of restitution of conjugal rights, which gives one spouse access to the comfort and surroundings of the other spouse, is the fundamental tenet of marital law. Its aim is to preserve the marriage, but what if one spouse cheats to secure a court order restoring conjugal rights? In order to ensure that there is no unfair enrichment that results in a joint family venture, the court must consider the fact that most relationships have reciprocal advantages. If a mother of two moves into the household and then works for the home, contributes financially, and receives "free" housing and board for herself and the kids, it suggests a cooperative family effort or merely an exchange of benefits. Although the creation of the joint family venture concept represents a considerable improvement for common law couples, it still falls short of what is offered in provinces where common law couples enjoy the same property rights as married couples.

Comments


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page