top of page

Case Analysis - Prakash & Ors. V. Phulvati & Ors (2015) 4 WBLR 793 (SC)




Jagriti Roy, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun


INTRODUCTION


Property has involved debate in families, for ages. Since the alteration of Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Amendment Act in 2005, daughters, independent of being hitched or unmarried will be considered as coparceners in a Hindu joint family, which is administered by Mitakshara regulation. This change can be characterized as 'progressive' due to its very nature of being supportive of women. In a demonstration, for the most part, gotten from Dharmashastras, that's what which say on the off chance that a son neglected to pay the obligations of his predecessors, the sole of that precursor would get back to the bank's home as a slave or a four-legged creature or a lady, achieving such colossal alteration which presents property privileges to women, is to be sure an excellent motion. Posthumous to an amendment, its application becomes significant in starting trends.

Comments


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page