Case Analysis On Justice KS Puttaswamy [Retired] Vs Union Of India And Ors
- IJLLR Journal
- Jul 10, 2022
- 1 min read
Arsh Mishra, Kalinga University Naya Raipur
NAME OF THE CASE: - Justice K.S. Puttaswamy[retired] vs. Union of India and ors.2017
CITATION:- Writ Petition [Civil] NO. 494 Of 2012,[2017] 10 SCC 1
INTRODUCTION:
“It’s better to be unique than the best, being the best makes you the number one, but being unique makes you the only one “ that’s the message government want to send through Aadhaar as it is described as the unique identity, and the authority which enroll a person and at behest the aadhaar card issue is known as unique identification authority of India. Aadhaar act was passed in 2016. The main purpose to introduce this act was to ensure that all the citizens should receive proper benefits and subsidies by the Government. The Supreme Court of India upheld the aadaar act and stuck down the provision of Act which was unconstitutional.
It was held that Right to privacy is a fundamental right under article 14,19 and 21 of the Indian constitution. The case of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy [retired] vs. Union of India and ors. Become the foundation of the “Right to privacy” jurisprudence in India.
Kommentare