top of page

Case Analysis: Donoghue V. Stevenson [1932 S.C. (H.L.) 31]




Chirag Behl, School of Law, Christ (Deemed to be University)

Case name – Donoghue v. Stevenson

Citation – 1932 S.C. (H.L.) 31 Appellant – Donoghue Respondent – Stevenson Bench – Lord Atkin, Buckmaster L, Tomlin L, Lord Thankerton, Lord Macmillan

Date of Judgment – 26 May 1932

INTRODUCTION

Donoghue v. Stevenson, popularly known as the ‘snail in the bottle case,' is a landmark case in Western legal history. It was not only a major decision in the growth of common law, but it was also vitally relevant to the development of tort law, a subject of law that still has significant uncertainties today. The case's revolutionary importance lies in the development of a uniform duty of care in negligence proceedings, as well as Lord Atkin's "neighbour principle." One of the most famous principles in tort law is negligence. It refers to a person's action that might be defined as unreasonable or reckless behaviour, or a breach of a legal responsibility to use reasonable caution, which causes injury to an individual.

Comments


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page