top of page

An Analysis Of Lie Detectors In Criminal Justice System




Manne Vaishnavi Rao, Alliance School of Law, Alliance University, Bengaluru

Neha S Menon, ICFAI Law School, Hyderabad

ABSTRACT

In an era where the crime rate is high and the conviction of criminals is lower, in the times of science and technology criminals have advanced their way of covering up their crimes and it is now difficult to prove their crimes. In consideration of such situations, lie detectors are useful. Lie detection is a cognitive process that evaluates a message as well as nonverbal indicators to detect fraud. It might also refer to questioning strategies combined with technology that monitors physiological activities to determine if an answer is true or untrue. Lie detectors are offered in a wide range of technologies. The polygraph is the most widespread and long-used technique.

This article aims to discuss lie detection tests in India and the objective is to identify and understand the strengths and weaknesses of lie detection tests. This paper also discusses the legality of such tests in India.

Keywords: India, Lie Detectors, Lie Detection Test, Brain Mapping, Polygraph, Narco Test, Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

Comments


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page