top of page

A Critical Analysis Of The Supreme Court Cases In India On Death Penalty




Tanveen Kaur, BA LLB (Hons), Christ (Deemed to be University) Lavasa, Pune

ABSTRACT

We live in a society where we hear about crimes unceasingly. Where ‘punishment’ becomes the only tool to deter crime. But not every crime and criminal can be punished with capital punishment. Crimes which are served with the punishment of death penalty are referred to as capital punishment. Our laws believe in the process of reformation or retribution. In earlier times the King believed in extreme tyranny, for even a mild crime the punishment was of severe nature. Death penalty was also a common punishment during the 1890’s. Section 368 of The Criminal Procedure Code of India grants the High Courts the authority to confirm a death sentence.

The Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 embodied in section 367 (5) that-

“If the accused is convicted of an offence punishable with death and the Court sentences him to any punishment other than death, the court shall in its judgement state the reason why sentence of death was not passed.”

Comments


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page